STUDY ATTRIBUTES
Study title
- all -
Andreou 2004a
Andreou 2004b
Bailey 2002
Berglund 2009
Boh 2004
Borissova 2002
Bugdahn 2005
Bähr 2006
Börzel / Buzogany 2010
Börzel 2000
Caddy 2000
Caporaso / Jupille 2001
Causse 2008
Claes 2002
Clift 2009
Demmke 1994
Di Lucia / Kronsell 2010
Dimitrakopoulos 2001
Dimitrova / Rhinard 2005
Dimitrova / Toshkov 2009
Duina 1997
Falkner et al. 2005
Furtlehner 2008
Geldermann et al. 2010
Hartlapp 2009
Haverland 2000
Héritier et al. 2001
Jordan 1999
Kaeding 2007
Karaczun 2005
Kerwer / Teutsch 2001
Kimber 2000
Kinnunen 2004
Knill / Lehmkuhl 1998
Knill / Lenschow 1998
Knill / Lenschow 2000
Krizsan 2009
Kryczka 2004
Laffan / O′Mahony 2004a
Laffan / O′Mahony 2004b
Leiber 2007
Maniokas 2009
Martinsen 2007
Mastenbroek 2007
McNally 2009
McRae 2006
Mocsári 2004a
Mocsári 2004b
Neyer 1999
Niskanen / Lehtela / Ketola / Nykyri 2010
Nunan 1999
Panke 2007
Rentea et al. 2008
Saarniit 2004a
Saarniit 2004b
Schimmelfennig 2003
Schulze 2008
Sedelmeier 2009
Slepcevic 2009
Steunenberg 2006
Steunenberg 2007
Treib 2003
Van der Vleuten 2005
Versluis 2004
Versluis 2007
Wiedermann 2008
Zalar 2008
Zemeckis et al. 2005
Country
- all -
Austria
Belgium
Czech Republic
Denmark
Estonia
Finland
France
Germany
Greece
Hungary
Ireland
Italy
Latvia
Lithuania
Luxembourg
Netherlands
Norway
Poland
Portugal
Romania
Slovakia
Slovenia
Spain
Sweden
Turkey
United Kingdom
Time period
- all -
1975 - 1980
1980 - 1985
1980 - 1990
1980 – 2000
1990 – 1995
1990 – 2000
1995 – 2000
2000 – 2005
2005 - 2010
Policy sector
- all -
Agriculture
Competition
Energy
Environment
Free movement of persons
Health protection
Human rights
Internal Market
Right of establishment and freedom to provide services
Security
Social policy
Transport
CELEX Number
- all -
1975/117/EEC
1976/160/EEC
1976/207/EEC
1980/778/EEC
1984/360/EEC
1985/337/EEC
1988/1841/EEC
1988/609/EEC
1990/313/EEC
1990/364/EEC
1990/547/EEC
1991/155/EEC
1991/440/EEC
1991/533/EEC
1991/676/EEC
1992/43/EEC
1992/43/EEC + 1979/409/EEC
1992/85/EEC
1993/104/EC
1993/3118/EEC
1994/22/EC
1994/33/EC
1994/62/EC
1996/34/EC
1996/61/EC
1996/82/EC
1996/92/EC
1997/12/EC
1997/27/EC
1997/81/EC
1998/30/EC
1998/44/EC
1998/55/EC
1998/76/EC
1999/31/EC
1999/74/EC
2000/31/EC
2000/36/EC
2000/43/EC
2000/60/EC
2000/78/EC
2001/14/EC
2001/37/EC
2001/53/EC
2002/44/EC
2002/59/EC
2002/73/EC
2003/30/EC
2003/55/EC
2003/88/EC
2004/18/EC
2004/25/EC
2005/85/EC
2006/123/EC
OJ L 1990 158/56
Regulation (EEC) No 1836/93
several
VDU 90/270/EEC
INPLEMENTATION OUTCOME
Transposition delay
- all -
0
1
Formal implementation
- all -
1
2
3
Administrative implementation
- all -
1
2
3
insufficient
sufficient
Application
- all -
1
2
3
Insufficient
sufficient
EXPLANATORY FACTOR
Variable Category
- all -
change of government
coordination capacity
coordination capacity
culture
directive feature
enforcement tools
EU enforcement
EU-level conflict
extraordinary events
federalism/regionalism
federalism/regionalism
general adm capacity
judicial enforcement
judicial enforcement
learning
misfit
national-level salience
national-level salience
NIM feature
other
preference
societal institutions
specific organizational issues
veto players
Variable
- all -
access to judicial system
administrative capacity
administrative culture
administrative overload
administrative reform
advocacy coalitions
availability of legal assistance
bureaucratic capacity
call back procedure
certainty and senforcement and sanctioning tool
change agents
change of government
clarity
complexity
conciliation committee
conditionality
conflicting interpretations
consultation and involvement of business actors
coordination problems
coordination strength
coordination strength
corporatism
cross-country learning
discretion
distribution of competences
domestic conflict
domestic opposition
ECJ ruling
efficiency
enforcement and sanctioning tool
environmental crisis
EU-level opposition
expected economic gains
experience
factual veto players
fear of victimization
financial threat
government support
individual empowerment
informal pressure
infringement
infringement - referal to ECJ
infringement – LFN
infringement – RO
inspection and sanctioning tool
institutional misfit
instrument specific players
involvement of environmental groups
involvement of industry
involvement of interest groups
involvement of NGOs
involvement of trade unions
involvement of trade unions and churches
issue linkage
issue salience
lack of qualified staff and expertise
lack of resources
language skills
legal culture
legal misfit
litigation
media interest
norm misfit
overall conflict at the time of adoption
package law
policy misfit
policy network
policy-specific veto players
political costs of compliance
political culture
political salience
preference configurations
privatisation
public support
quality
reports by the COM
scope
single loop learning
size of regulated entities
supervision
support building
terrorism
transposition technique
type
Edit Search